Technical Assistance Partnership for Child and Family Mental Health

Technical Assistance Partnership for Child and Family Mental Health

Primary Care and Systems of Care
Frequently Asked Questions

June 2004

What is case management under the Early Periodic Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment Program and what is the regulatory basis for it?

The Early Periodic Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment Program (EPSDT) requires “early and periodic screening, diagnostic, and treatment services (as defined in subsection [r]) for individuals who are eligible under the plan (i.e., for Medicaid) and are under the age of 21.” (See Section 1905 [a] [4] [B] of the Social Security Act.) States must also inform families with Medicaid-eligible children under the age of 21 years about the availability and importance of EPSDT services and must make arrangements for the provision of these services for families who request them. Further, the statute requires that the states must provide certain services including “comprehensive health and developmental history (including assessment of both physical and mental health development)” (Section 1905 [r]][1] [B] [i]). These services must meet reasonable standards of care and be provided at reasonable intervals after consultation with recognized medical and dental organizations involved in child health care so as to enable providers to determine the existence of physical and mental illnesses and conditions (Sections 1905 [r] [1][A] [i] and [ii]). Further, the states are required to provide necessary health care, diagnostic, and treatment services that are required to “correct or ameliorate defects and physical and mental illnesses and conditions discovered by the screening services, whether or not such services are covered under the State Plan” (Section 1905 [r] [5]). The federal regulation reiterates and expands on these requirements (42 CFR, Section 441.56). Thus the federal statute and regulations require that State Medicaid agencies implement a complex and comprehensive program of screening, diagnostic, and treatment services, including mental health services.

The term, “case management” first appears in the EPSDT guidelines as part of the State Medicaid Manual, CMS-Pub.45-5. In the “Overview” portion of the guidelines, it states that the EPSDT program consists of two, mutually supportive, operational components:

  • Ensuring the availability and accessibility of required health care resources
  • Helping Medicaid recipients and their parents or guardians effectively use them

In order to enable Medicaid State agencies to manage the EPSDT program states must:

  • Ensure that health problems found are diagnosed and treated early, before they become more complex and their treatment more costly. Although “case management” does not appear in the statutory provisions pertaining to the EPSDT benefit, the concept has been recognized as a means of increasing program efficiency and effectiveness by ensuring that needed services are provided timely and efficiently, and that duplicated and unnecessary services are avoided (State Medicaid Manual [CMS-Pub. 45-5, Section 5010]).

Case management services are specifically cited in several other places in the State Medicaid Manual. In Section 5230 of the State Medicaid Manual, Coordination with Related Agencies and Programs, public agencies such as social services agencies funded through Title XX of the Social Security Act are mentioned as having the potential roles of providing supportive services that include case management. The State Maternal and Child Health (MCH) agencies, funded through Title V of Social Security Act/MCH Block Grant, are cited as having a major coordinative role in the EPSDT program. Specifically cited is their role in case management (State Medicaid Manual [CMS-Pub. 45-5, Section 5230 and 5230.1]). The Mental Health State agency is also a public agency given the statutory and regulatory requirement to screen, diagnose, and treat children for mental health issues. All three of these programs have roles in serving children and adolescents with behavioral health issues. Part B of IDEA serves children ages 3 to 21 years who have at least one of thirteen disabilities including autism or emotional disturbances as well as physical health disabilities and developmental delays. MCH provides services to many of the same population served by Medicaid and have special interests in early identification and treatment of young children at risk for emotional disturbances.

The EPSDT guidelines also cite case management in the Continuing Care section of the State Medicaid Manual, Section 5240. That section details the concept of providing a continuum of services that includes EPSDT screening, diagnostic, and treatment services, acute illness care and referral to specialty providers when necessary including mental health services. The Manual stipulates that:

  • States are responsible for ensuring that there is adequate tracking or case management for continuing care services
  • These services can either be provided by the “continuing care provider” or through other arrangements
  • States must monitor that the actual services including case management are being provided.

Payment for Case Management under EPSDT

Federal financial participation (FFP) is available to cover the costs to public agencies such as Title XX and MCH that provide direct support to the Medicaid State agency in administering the EPSDT program. Among the services listed is case management. Written agreements, while not absolutely required under the federal guidelines, have been “deemed essential” to effective working relationships with these public agencies. Each agreement must specify the participating parties; their intent; mutual objectives; the services each party offers and in what circumstances; exchange of reports of services furnished; methods for review and joint planning; abd liaison between parties including designation of staff and joint evaluation of policies. Cooperative agreements or contracts with other agencies and programs, such as Title V, may include payment for certain administrative functions such as outreach and case management (State Medicaid Manual, CMS-Pub. 45-5, Sections 5230 and 5340).

Further, 75% FFP is available for the “cost of skilled professional medical personnel and directly supporting staff employed by the Title XIX State agency or other public agency if they meet the requirements of 42 CFR 432.50” (State Medicaid Manual, CMS-Pub. 45-5, Section 4340, B Reimbursement, Services/Administrative Functions). Under 42 CFR 432.50, (b), (1), there is a cross reference to another section of the federal Medicaid regulation that defines these staff (42 CFR, Section 432.2). The pertinent definitions for this discussion include:

  • “Skilled professional medical personnel” means physicians, dentists, nurses, and other specialized personnel who have professional education and training in the field of medical care or appropriate medical practice and who are in an employer-employee relationship with the Medicaid agency. It does not include other non-medical health professionals such as public administrators, medical analysts, lobbyists, senior managers, or administrators of public assistance programs or the Medicaid program.
  • “Directly supporting staff” means secretarial, stenographic. . . services that directly support the responsibilities of skilled professional medical personnel, and who are in employer-employee relationship with the Medicaid agency.
  • “Staff of other public agencies” means skilled medical personnel and directly supporting staff employed in state or local agencies other than the Medicaid agency that perform duties that directly relate to the administration of the Medicaid program.

Therefore, individuals who are employed either by the Medicaid state agency and another public agency, such as the Mental Health state agency and the/Title V state agency who are providing case management to ensure that children and adolescents needing mental health, developmental, and other services would be viewed as either skilled professional personnel, or supporting staff of other agencies. Thus, the Medicaid state agency could draw down 75% FFP for these services. The Medicaid state agency could reimburse the Mental Health state agency for its case management services with regard to ensuring that mental health services are provided on a timely basis.